<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CDS Church Building &#38; Capital Campaign Consultants &#187; Church Loan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amiccs.com/category/church-loan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amiccs.com</link>
	<description>Church Consulting and Coaching</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Church Financing &#8211; Still a Tough Market</title>
		<link>http://amiccs.com/2009/06/church-financing-still-a-tough-market/</link>
		<comments>http://amiccs.com/2009/06/church-financing-still-a-tough-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church Capital Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amiccs.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Churches continue to have difficulty getting the financing they need for buildling or relocation. We have seen any number of churches that should be able to get financed turned down by lender after lender. Many churches that are getting turned down for financing today could have been financed a year ago with exactly the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Churches continue to have difficulty getting the financing they need for buildling or relocation.  We have seen any number of churches that should be able to get financed turned down by lender after lender. Many churches that are getting turned down for financing today could have been financed a year ago with exactly the same financial statements.  The biggest impediment to financing is inadequate cash flow &#8211; not enough money left after expenses to service a mortgage. Unlike previous years, lenders are not willing to wager that the church will reduce discretionary expenses to service a mortgage or increase income because of growth.  Today, lenders want to see&nbsp;6-12 monts of financial history showing a cash surplus sufficient to cover a mortgage.
<div></div>
<div>Many churches <i>are </i>qualifying for loans, they&#8217;re just qualifying for significantly less than last year, and less than they need for the <a href="http://www.churchplansource.com/">church plans</a> they have.  For churches that cannot qualify for as as large of a loan as they need in order to build, they need to raise the difference in cash.</div>
<div></div>
<div>There are three things that a church can do to improve cash flow.  The church needs to apply a sharp knife and cut expenses, it needs to faithfully preach and teach about giving and stewardship, and it needs to run a <a href="http://www.ourcapitalcampaign.com/">capital campaign</a> (which will also help with coming up with the cash difference between what they need and what they can borrow).</div>
<div></div>
<div>Cutting expenses is difficult, but a necessity for many who want to build.  Trimming expenses and increasing income and cash on hand through a capital campaign is the financial answer to many of today&#8217;s church financing problems.</div>
<div class='kouguu_fb_like_button'><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://amiccs.com/2009/06/church-financing-still-a-tough-market/&#038;layout=standard&#038;show_faces=false&#038;width=425&#038;height=25&#038;action=recommend&#038;colorscheme=light&#038;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:425px; height:25px;"></iframe></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amiccs.com/2009/06/church-financing-still-a-tough-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Year of the Church Capital Campaign</title>
		<link>http://amiccs.com/2009/02/the-year-of-the-church-capital-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://amiccs.com/2009/02/the-year-of-the-church-capital-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church Capital Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amiccs.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The banks have money to lend, they just don&#8217;t seem to want to do it. This week a number of the largest banks were called before Congress who basically told them to make more of the bailout money available for loans. Some lenders have just stopped lending to churches while others are setting the bar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The banks have money to lend, they just don&#8217;t seem to want to do it</span>.  This week a number of the largest banks were called before Congress who basically told them to make more of the bailout money available for loans.  Some lenders have just stopped lending to churches while others are setting the bar so high, that if you can qualify for the loan, you probably didn&#8217;t need it.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The money is out there, its just not as easy to get</span>.  Banks are requiring many times the level of documentation and are lending less.  A year ago, a church could reasonably expect to borrow 80% of the appraised value of a completed project (80% Loan to Value or LTV), today if you are fortunate, the lenders may lend you 80% of the project cost (as opposed to project value) and some lenders are talking 60% and 65% loans.</p>
<p>As one lender recently stated to me, &#8220;<span style="font-style: italic;">cash flow is King, and cash on hand is Queen.</span>&#8221; What many lenders will require to see today is at least 20% of your project cost in cash and a monthly net positive cash flow that is 125% of the loan payment.  These criteria make it very difficult for the church to borrow today without significant and time consuming preparation.  To qualify for a loan, the church needs money in the bank and a history of positive cash flow.  Most churches are not in this situation, even though they have an immediate need to build.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">There are three things a church can do to prepare that will help it become qualified to borrow for construction:</span></p>
<p>1. Reduce Expenses.  As the past treasurer of my church I can assure you that almost every budget can be cut, often dramatically.  It&#8217;s never easy, but it can be done. The good news is that trimming the expense side of the ministry requires only commitment and a sharp knife.<br />
2. Increase Income.  You need to have the largest possible gap (positive, that is) between income and expense.  Increasing income through tithes and offerings is 50% of that battle.<br />
3. Increase cash on hand.  Put a line item in the budget for debt retirement even before you get a loan and put the money into savings.  Add to this amount whatever you can by increasing giving and decreasing expenses.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Increasing income and cash on hand can both be accomplished through a church  capital campaign</span>. <span style="font-style: italic;">(Follow this link to learn more about a <a href="http://www.ourcapitalcampaign.com/">church capital campaign</a>.</span> Historically, the vast majority of churches have waited until they were about to build or were in the process before beginning a capital campaign. I believe that many churches that need to build now will not be able to get financing and begin construction until late this year or even this time next year because they cannot meet the new lending requirements of cash on hand and cash flow. Although the church may have equity, even cash equity, if they cannot show a history of positive cash flow, they probably will not be able to get adequate financing.</p>
<p>I believe that many churches are going to come to the hard realization that they cannot get the financing they need and that to qualify will take them many months of demonstrated financial change.  I believe we will see a large number of churches want to enter into capital campaigns very soon so they may build next year.  Remember, the banks will want to see 6-12 months of reduced expenses and increased giving (due in large part to a church capital campaign) before approving the church loan.  The wise church will plan ahead and get their campaign underway as soon as possible.  To this anticipated need, we are bringing on additional staff and looking at creative and cost effective ways to help churches execute their capital campaigns.
<div class='kouguu_fb_like_button'><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://amiccs.com/2009/02/the-year-of-the-church-capital-campaign/&#038;layout=standard&#038;show_faces=false&#038;width=425&#038;height=25&#038;action=recommend&#038;colorscheme=light&#038;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:425px; height:25px;"></iframe></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amiccs.com/2009/02/the-year-of-the-church-capital-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

